This paper must include the entirety of your first draft, edited for any commentary that I and/or your peer reviewers have given.
After that edited text, you must then transition to your argument.
You are to argue for a solution to the problem that you raised at the end of your case study. You must argue from the perspective of, and by using the principles of, one of the ethical systems we have studied this semester.
To refresh your memory, those systems are:
Social Contract Theory
Divine Command Theory
Natural Law Theory
Kantian Ethics (Deontology)
Ethics of Care (Feminist Ethics)
Your argument should show that you are familiar enough with the system you chose to use that you both understand the principles of the system and how to apply them to the situation in your case study in order to come to a rational solution of how you would advise us to act in those circumstances.
You should add at least 2 new sources (for a total bare minimum of 7 sources) that you used to help you understand the system in question and apply it to your case study. Neither of these sources can be your Textbook (though you may cite the excerpts of primary source material from the Sourcebook) I have encouraged you to use the SEP in the Useful Resources for the Semester tab, please actually use the resource and follow the bibliographical links at the bottom of the article you look up.
You must actually argue for your position. You may not simply tell me how you feel about something. You must explain your reasons for why we should act in the way you suggest.
Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.
The post first draft, edited for any commentary that I and/or your peer reviewers have given. first appeared on Submit Your Homework.